Gay Books for Kids: Censoring Lesbian Moms & Penguin Dads

Scott Stiffler READ TIME: 11 MIN.

When was the first time you saw a portrayal, positive or otherwise, of LGBT existence? If you came of age before the Internet, chances are it was an exaggerated sitcom character or a tragic victim of AIDS -- hardly encouraging for a young person questioning their sexuality or forming an opinion of LGBTs. It's good to know, then -- the next time you see two gay men pushing a stroller and doting over their little bundle of joy -- that the kid's toy chest will likely include books depicting LGBT families along with staples like "Goodnight Moon" and "Where the Wild Things Are."

Two, Twenty-One, or Never?

But what age is appropriate to begin introducing the concept of families headed by those whose identity is so closely associated with their sexuality? Depending upon your political and religious affiliation, it's somewhere between two, twenty-one and never. Aaron Cooper, Ph.D. (author of "I Just Want My Kids To Be Happy: Why You Shouldn't Say It, Why You Shouldn't Think It, What You Should Embrace Instead") believes that early childhood is the best time to start cultivating a favorable attitude towards LGBTs: "A few positive words in a child's storybook may contribute to a picture of good mental health for a youngster discovering his or her LGBT status. Before children and teens are necessarily able to identify their own sexual orientation, the exposure to positive portrayals of LGBT people can make the difference between self-hate or self-acceptance if they later discover that they don't fit the heterosexual model. It also lays a foundation that becomes the basis for us to be able to reach out with understanding when, in our own lives, someone we know identifies as LGBT."

Cooper suggests that a good barometer of what's appropriate for a specific age group is to ask how heterosexual orientation is presented. "If literature for pre-schoolers portrays a family with parents identified simply as Mom and Dad, then it makes sense to create literature for pre-schoolers with LGBT parents. If literature for middle schoolers portrays a boy and girl holding hands as they walk home from school, then comparable literature might portray two girls holding hands." Young children, notes Cooper, "accept the fact of LGBT existence without judgment or criticism" before the influence of church, family and stereotypes begins to shape and sway their beliefs.

Many still regard any positive mention of LGBTs as indoctrination (although given its definition, one could argue that everything from toilet training to learning the alphabet song is indoctrination). Deborah T. Meem, PhD, Professor of English and Women's Studies; Co-director of Graduate Studies, Women's Studies, University of Cincinnati, finds the very question as to whether LGBT books for children are propaganda to be "hostile and insulting, because it assumes that LGBT-themed books have an agenda that straight-themed books do not. From McGuffey's readers to Dick and Jane and beyond, American children's books have always had as an overt purpose the correct socializing of kids into a straight, white, middle-class culture of sexism, heterosexism, and consumerism."

But even when indoctrination crosses the line to become ideological recruiting or propaganda, those who bristle at the values children other than their own are taught needn't worry. Precious toddlers who dutifully recite what they're told inevitably grow up to become savvy tweens and disenchanted teens who question or reject what their parents taught them. Meem: "By the time young children have grown into adolescence, they are presumably ready for more complex portrayals of life, and at this time books shift to 'problem' themes (drugs, abuse, and yes, even homosexuality). A youngster's sexual confusion may qualify as a 'problem' in this sense, and may not be shown as populated by 'positive images' of gayness. This, however, is no different than other adolescent problem fiction, which typically shows a young person encountering the outside world -- in its goodness and badness -- for the first time."

Two Trailblazing Books

Meem points out that trailblazing books such as "Heather Has Two Mommies" and "Daddy's Roommate" "seemed 'propagandistic' to right-wing homophobes who sought to protect children (and others) from contagious homosexuality. And maybe an argument can be made that these two books did have a didactic function in terms of seeking acceptance for gay families in a hostile world." Today, Meem cites a significantly changed marketplace and culture where a new generation of children's books such as "'King & King' and 'Antonio's Card' tell stories of children making brave choices -- and the fact that the brave choices take place in an LGBT context is less aggressively indicated, and more part of an intersectional presentation that characterizes the books generally."

Laurina Cashin, Educational Marketing Director of